Kevin Pietersen Not terrible for a portion of a batsman

It does not matter that this Adelaide pitch is compliment than the flattest flapjack – or maybe compliment than a middle age map that guarantees the entire world is level – Kevin Pietersen’s 213no was training in exact going after batting. It was a wonderful exertion. In any case, what was considerably more noteworthy was the reality he didn’t play a solitary shot off the back foot. At the point when I was a youngster, I was sufficiently fortunate to go to a cricket training camp run by Tom Graveney. He let us know that batting was basically a straightforward craftsmanship.

Assuming the ball is full you proceed and pass through the line of the ball

On the off chance that the ball is short, you return and essentially play a similar shot. Kevin Pietersen disregards this. Assuming the ball is full he goes ahead, and in the event that the ball is short he … fail … proceeds. His eye should be astounding, and his dexterity magnificent. To find lasting success in Australia, you want to have areas of strength for a foot game – except if, obviously, you’re a virtuoso. At the point when KP raised his century yesterday, he hadn’t scored a solitary run behind square on the offside. Simply contemplate that briefly.

No diversions down to third man, no edges through the slips, and not a solitary back cut. Pietersen doesn’t cut. He can’t. He simply gets on the front foot, regardless of how short the ball is, and cuts it through the covers, or opens the face and purposely cuts it over point. How might you do this in test cricket against 90mph conveyances? It’s much more astounding when you consider that KP experienced childhood in a nation like South Africa, where the pitches are hard and the bowling is wild. There probably been a satiate of quick bowlers lining up to hit his head.

In spite of the fact that I’d reluctantly recommend that KP is somewhat powerless against the short stuff – Glenn McGrath finished his visit in 2006/07 when KP strolled into a rib wafer – the measurements say something else. Peter Sidle’s endeavors to skip him out yesterday were bizarre. It just brought a whirlwind of limits. Brett Lee attempted exactly the same thing at the Oval in 2005, yet the ball continued to vanish into the group.

Assuming I was Ricky Ponting and express gratitude toward God I’m not

I wouldn’t abandon the short ball right now. Ryan Harris nearly executed KP the previous morning I actually think an unexpected short ball could fix him later in the series. The mystery obviously, isn’t to broadcast the ploy by putting three men on the leg-side limit and afterward bowling Each ball short. Bouncers are fast enough when you’re 22 yards away – simply ask Michael Clarke – however KP surges down the pitch and plays guards off nineteen yards more often than not. He should have big brass balls. Shane Warne said on discourse yesterday that KP was the most normally gifted batsman he’d found in twenty years of playing top of the line cricket. We agree.

It’s absolutely impossible that that anyone other than a virtuoso can bat with a method so straightforward – or so one-layered. Kevin Pietersen is really a portion of a batsman. Envision how great he could be on the off chance that he could really play off the back foot? My doubt, in any case, is that we ought to appreciate him while we can. He most likely can’t have a lot of time left at the top. Pietersen is just thirty years of age, yet when his eye begins to break down in three to five years’ time, it’s clearly beyond the realm of possibilities for him to continue to play the same way. When his eye begins to go, he will not have the option to return to a strong technique.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *